Edge Labs EDGE LABS Market intelligence
CFB NFL NBA CBB
← This week's NFL board
NFL · week 5 · Sun, Oct 11 · outdoors · grass · FINAL Chicago Bears 7, Green Bay Packers 31

Chicago Bears at Green Bay Packers. Lean: Green Bay Packers +2.5. Lean: Under 46.

The call

Lean W Spread
Green Bay Packers +2.5
-110 · DraftKings
Ace backs this callStack backs this callBuck backs this call 2 of 3
locked +2.5 · closed +1.5
taken Wed 7:46pm ET
Lean W Total
Under 46
-110 · BetMGM
Ace backs this callStack backs this callBuck backs this call 2 of 3
locked 46 · closed 46.5

The panelists

Ace backs this call
The fox
SpreadGreen Bay Packers +2.5
TotalUnder 46
Play toGreen Bay Packers +2.5
Play toUnder 46
Keys to the game
  • The official Wednesday report lists Williams as DNP with a hamstring injury, and lists four Chicago offensive and defensive starters or rotation players as DNP or limited.
  • Chicago stated that Williams would miss his second consecutive game against the Jets because of the hamstring injury.
  • The Packers game center identifies the Week 5 matchup, records of 3-1 and 2-2, and a noon CDT kickoff listing.
What beats it

On the spread. If Williams returns to full practice and starts without limitation, Chicago's stronger recent form and Green Bay's depleted interior line make laying less than a field goal defensible. If multiple Packers linemen are ruled out, the plus points lose much of their appeal.

On the total. A full Williams practice return, active Chicago backs and stable lineups would validate the move upward, while Green Bay's defensive-front injuries could aid Chicago's scoring. Dry mild weather removes the usual Lambeau weather constraint.

Read Ace's full case

Spread.Market first: Chicago is a road favorite because its 3-1 start contrasts with Green Bay's 2-2 record, while the Packers carry a meaningful cluster of offensive-line absences and limitations. The market has also already moved through Green Bay favoritism to Bears favoritism, so it has recognized the current team trajectories. I lean Packers +2.5 because Chicago quarterback Caleb Williams was still a Wednesday nonparticipant with the hamstring issue that cost him the prior two games, yet Chicago is laying points at Lambeau. The Bears can still function with their backups, so this is not a bet, but the quarterback uncertainty is more consequential than the small rating gap. Our listed number favors Chicago by 4.1, but its raw margin favors Green Bay by 1.7, an internal conflict that makes it poor confirmation.

Total.Mild outdoor conditions offer no weather-driven under case. I still lean under 46 because Williams remained a Wednesday DNP, Chicago listed both running backs and two interior linemen as DNP, and Green Bay has several offensive-line absences or limitations. Those are meaningful paths to slower drives or reduced finishing efficiency. The total model's 44.96 estimate is only context, especially given its weaker holdout error and documented high bias. The increase to 46 creates a playable lean but not a bet before final quarterback and line designations.

Where our number looks wrong.The spread output is internally inconsistent: its raw home margin of negative 1.7 denotes Green Bay favoritism under its own convention, while its calibrated number lists Green Bay as a 4.1-point underdog. Its documented 47.6% development ATS result also offers no basis to prefer the larger calibrated Bears edge.

More key facts
  • The official Wednesday injury report lists Williams, Swift, Monangai, Jackson and Thuney as DNP.
  • Action Network displayed a 45 total, 71 F temperature, zero rain and 13 wind for the game page.
  • The official Packers game center lists the matchup at Lambeau Field and provides the competing noon CDT kickoff listing.
Stack backs this call
The bull
SpreadGreen Bay Packers +2.5
TotalUnder 46
Play toGreen Bay Packers +2.5
Play toUnder 46
Keys to the game
  • Bagent will start vs Green Bay; Williams week to week with hamstring; Bears 23-12 over Jets
  • Parsons ruled out Sunday, Cooper out for season with torn Achilles, Monangai thumb day to day
  • Packers 17, Buccaneers 14; Green Bay 2-2
What beats it

On the spread. If Thuney, Jackson and Wright practice fully by Friday, Chicago has a healthy line, a backup quarterback who has already won twice behind it, and a defense facing a Packers offense that has stalled for most of four weeks with two starting guards out. Without Parsons and Cooper the Green Bay defense loses its best pass rusher and its best linebacker, and the market may simply be right that Chicago is the better team by more than a field goal on a neutral field.

On the total. Green Bay's defense without its top pass rusher and top linebacker may not stop a Bears offense that has scored in the twenties with backups, and Jordan Love had 1,000 yards through four games; a couple of short fields could carry this over 46 easily. The total move from 44 to 46 suggests sharper money already sees more scoring than our model.

Read Stack's full case

Spread.Market first: Chicago is 3-1 with a +47 point differential and has won with three different quarterbacks, while Green Bay is 2-2 at -32 after a 35-14 home loss to Atlanta and a 17-14 escape at winless Tampa Bay. Micah Parsons is out with his ACL recovery and Edgerrin Cooper is reported lost for the season, so the move from Green Bay -2.5 at the DraftKings and FanDuel open to Chicago -2.5 now is mostly explained. What I think the move has not fully absorbed is the Bears side: Tyson Bagent starts for Caleb Williams, and the 10/7 practice report lists offensive linemen J. Thuney, J. Jackson and D. Wright as DNP plus both D'Andre Swift and Kyle Monangai. A road favorite with a backup quarterback, three interior linemen and both backs on the report, laying points at Lambeau in a division game, is a price I would rather take than lay. That is a lean on Green Bay +2.5, not a bet, because the Packers' own interior line is also thin and their form is poor.

Total.The total opened 44 to 45 and has been bet to 45.5 to 46. The over case is real: Green Bay is without Parsons and Cooper, and Chicago has scored 27 and 23 the last two weeks with backups. The under case: Chicago is starting its backup quarterback with three interior linemen and both backs on the report, Green Bay has two starting guards out and scored 17 against a winless Tampa Bay, and it is an early kickoff division game where Chicago will want to run and shorten the game behind a defense allowing few points. I lean under at 46 but the upward move and the depleted Packers defense keep it a lean.

Where our number looks wrong.The rating still carries a mostly preseason prior and a projected QB flag set to Caleb Williams for Chicago; with Bagent starting and three Bears interior linemen on the report, Chicago +3.07 overstates the team that actually takes the field. It also cannot see that Green Bay is without Parsons and Cooper, so it is wrong in both directions and its 1.8 point gap carries little information here.

More key facts
  • Kickoff moved to noon CT after the game was flexed out of the national window with Williams out
  • Parsons ruled out, Cooper out for season
  • Packers 17, Buccaneers 14
  • Bagent starts; Bears 23-12 over Jets
Buck backs this call
The bear
SpreadGreen Bay Packers +2.5
TotalUnder 46
Play toGreen Bay Packers +3.5
Play toUnder 47.5
Keys to the game
  • Search results on Williams hamstring were mixed and referred to an earlier injury, not a confirmed Week 5 designation
What beats it

On the spread. If Williams practices fully Wednesday and Thursday and plays, the Bears at minus 2 are a fair or cheap price given Johnson's offense and a Packers line missing multiple guards; if he sits, Chicago would flip to an underdog and Green Bay plus 2.5 would be wrong in the other direction.

On the total. A healthy Williams and a Packers offense against a thin Bears defense could push this over 46, and the market drift upward since open supports that.

Read Buck's full case

Spread.The market makes Chicago a small road favorite of 2 to 2.5 at a divisional game in Lambeau, which on its face prices Caleb Williams as healthy and Chicago slightly ahead of Green Bay on a neutral basis. That is the strongest explanation for the number: Ben Johnson's offense and a 2025 point differential close to Green Bay's, plus a home field credit that appears to be shaded by the market. The captured injury scan lists Williams as a non participant on Tuesday 10/6 with a hamstring, along with RB Swift, RB Monangai and several Bears interior linemen. I could not confirm his practice status or game designation from a dated primary source, and my web search returned mixed or stale items from other seasons. Because the market is still holding Chicago as the favorite while the starting QB shows as a Tuesday non participant, the data is contradictory and a Green Bay side cannot be supported without knowing whether Williams plays.

Total.The total sits at 45.5 to 46 with BetMGM at 46 after opening at 44 to 45, so the market has moved up modestly. The strongest case for the number is two offenses with decent 2025 efficiency in a divisional game. The under case rests on a possibly compromised Bears quarterback and running game plus a Packers line missing interior blockers, while the over case rests on Johnson and LaFleur offenses being efficient and the line having drifted up. I found no dated weather forecast I trust; one search result was clearly wrong for October. Without incremental evidence, a generic under is not supportable, and the quarterback uncertainty cuts both ways on pace and scoring.

More key facts
  • Weather search returned an implausible forecast not tied to this season, so it is not used

The call, written up

On the spread

Chicago at Green Bay, Chicago -2.5. DraftKings and FanDuel opened Green Bay -2.5 on Sept. 29 and now show Chicago -2.5; splits were not verified. Much of the swing is explained: Micah Parsons is out with his ACL recovery and Edgerrin Cooper is out for the season with an Achilles injury (Chicago Sun-Times, Oct. 5). Green Bay is 2-2. Chicago is 3-1 but starts backup Tyson Bagent with Caleb Williams out (Newsweek, Oct. 5), and the official Oct. 7 report lists Williams, D'Andre Swift, Kyle Monangai, Jonah Jackson and Joe Thuney as nonparticipants. The counter-case: if the Bears linemen practice fully by Friday, Chicago has a healthy front and a backup who has already won twice, while Green Bay lacks two guards. Take Green Bay +2.5 at -110 at DraftKings.

On the total

Under 46. Forecasts dated Oct. 7 show dry, mild conditions, so weather gives no under case. The lean rests on a Chicago offense with a backup quarterback and several nonparticipants on the Oct. 7 report, plus Green Bay line absences. The counter-case: Green Bay is without Parsons and Cooper, and Chicago scored 27 and 23 in its last two wins with backups. Take Under 46 at -110 at BetMGM.

How to read this page

The calls come first on this page: the spread and the total, each a Pick or a Lean, then Ace, Stack and Buck one by one. The market's number, our number and the gap between them sit further down as MODEL CONTEXT: that is the input our analyst panel argued from, not a call of its own. A Pick is our strongest call and goes on the record. A Lean is which way we lean on a game and is not a pick.The meter shows how strongly the panel backs the call. It is not a probability or a hit rate.

Line movement · market

Where the spread and the total opened, where they sit now, and how far each has moved since our first capture open with membership. Membership

Model context

The numbers the panel argued from. Our models price a game, the panel makes the call, and the calls above are the call. Nothing in this block is a call. Where the panel's written case cites a raw number of its own, the calibrated number is the one printed here.

Market line
Chicago Bears -1.5
DraftKings
Our model number
Green Bay Packers by 0.5
the calibrated EL NFL Rating number
Spread gap
2 points
the distance between our model number and the market. Context for the panel, not a call of its own.
Market total
46.8
market total at the model run, Oct 12, 12:39 PM ET
Our total
45.0
EL NFL Totals
Total gap
-1.8
the distance between our model total and the market total. Context for the panel, not a call of its own.

The totals number is a registered candidate that loses to the closing total: across 1,087 held out games it missed the combined score by 10.46 points on average and the closing total missed by 10.189, ahead of us in all 4 of those seasons, so it never posts to the board and never enters the record on its own.

The write-up

The case

Chicago at Green Bay, Chicago -2.5. DraftKings and FanDuel opened Green Bay -2.5 on Sept. 29 and now show Chicago -2.5; splits were not verified. Much of the swing is explained: Micah Parsons is out with his ACL recovery and Edgerrin Cooper is out for the season with an Achilles injury (Chicago Sun-Times, Oct. 5). Green Bay is 2-2. Chicago is 3-1 but starts backup Tyson Bagent with Caleb Williams out (Newsweek, Oct. 5), and the official Oct. 7 report lists Williams, D'Andre Swift, Kyle Monangai, Jonah Jackson and Joe Thuney as nonparticipants. The counter-case: if the Bears linemen practice fully by Friday, Chicago has a healthy front and a backup who has already won twice, while Green Bay lacks two guards. Take Green Bay +2.5 at -110 at DraftKings.

Recorded price

draftkings: Green Bay Packers +2.5 at -110, verified 2026-10-07T23:46:02.492Z.

The total

Under 46 (Lean). Under 46. Forecasts dated Oct. 7 show dry, mild conditions, so weather gives no under case. The lean rests on a Chicago offense with a backup quarterback and several nonparticipants on the Oct. 7 report, plus Green Bay line absences. The counter-case: Green Bay is without Parsons and Cooper, and Chicago scored 27 and 23 in its last two wins with backups. Take Under 46 at -110 at BetMGM.

written before kickoff, frozen at kickoff

Trends and splits

Descriptive context, every line with the games it counts. Filters like these did not hold up as predictors in our testing, so none of this feeds a call and none of it is a reason a pick wins. Situational splits look back 3 seasons and need at least 8 decided games to be shown at all. Records against the number and on the total are graded at each game's closing line, the last quote before kickoff at DraftKings, FanDuel and BetMGM. A game we have no capture for is graded at the number the league data carries.

Chicago Bears
  • covered 3 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total went over in 1 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total has gone under in their last 3 games
  • 1-7 straight up in divisional games after a straight up loss (n=8, 2024 to 2025)
Green Bay Packers
  • covered 1 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total went over in 2 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • 9-3-1 straight up in road favored games (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
Over and under splits
Chicago Bears
  • the total went over in 3 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total is 3-9 to the over in home favored games (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
Green Bay Packers
  • the total went over in 6 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total is 6-2 to the over in road indoor games (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 6-2 to the over indoors (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
Every split we can compute on this game
Chicago Bears
  • won 3 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • covered 3 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total went over in 1 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • won 6 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • covered 6 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total went over in 3 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total has gone under in their last 3 games
  • 1-7 straight up in divisional games after a straight up loss (n=8, 2024 to 2025)
  • 2-8 straight up in day divisional games (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-8 straight up in underdog divisional games (n=10, 2024 to 2025)
  • 11-3 straight up as a favorite (n=14, 2024 to 2026)
  • 11-3 straight up in favored outdoor games (n=14, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-7 straight up in grass divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-7 straight up in outdoor divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 10-3 straight up in favored day games (n=13, 2024 to 2026)
  • 10-3 straight up in favored grass games (n=13, 2024 to 2026)
  • 3-10 straight up as an underdog after a straight up loss (n=13, 2024 to 2026)
  • 3-10 straight up in divisional games (n=13, 2024 to 2026)
  • 9-3 straight up in home favored games (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 3-9 to the over in home favored games (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 2-6 to the over in night games (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-6 straight up in road indoor games (n=8, 2024 to 2025)
  • the total is 2-6 to the over in road indoor games (n=8, 2024 to 2025)
  • 2-6 straight up in underdog indoor games (n=8, 2024 to 2025)
  • the total is 2-6 to the over in underdog indoor games (n=8, 2024 to 2025)
Green Bay Packers
  • won 2 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • covered 1 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total went over in 2 of their last 5 (n=5, 2025 to 2026)
  • won 4 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • covered 3 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • the total went over in 6 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • 9-3-1 straight up in road favored games (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 6-2 to the over in road indoor games (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 6-2 to the over indoors (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 2-6 to the over on grass after a straight up loss (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 3-8 to the over outdoors after a straight up loss (n=11, 2024 to 2026)
  • 4-10 against the number in road day games (n=14, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 3-7 to the over in day games after a straight up loss (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • 3-7 against the number on the road after a straight up loss (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • the total is 3-7 to the over on the road after a straight up loss (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • 14-6 straight up in favored day games (n=20, 2024 to 2026)
  • 14-6 straight up in outdoor day games (n=20, 2024 to 2026)
  • 7-3-1 straight up as a favorite after a straight up loss (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • 7-3 straight up in day games after a straight up loss (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • 4-9 against the number in road favored games (n=13, 2024 to 2026)
  • 13-6 straight up in day grass games (n=19, 2024 to 2026)
  • 6-13-1 against the number on the road (n=19, 2024 to 2026)
  • 17-8 straight up in favored outdoor games (n=25, 2024 to 2026)
  • 19-9-1 straight up as a favorite (n=28, 2024 to 2026)
  • 5-10 against the number after a straight up loss (n=15, 2024 to 2026)
The context, and where the numbers come from

The context we can hand you free

Rest. Green Bay Packers 7 days · Chicago Bears 7 days Rest comes straight from the schedule. Be careful reading it as an edge: we tested rest as an input to our number and it made out of sample error worse, so it is context, not a signal.

Venue. Roof and surface on file: outdoors · grass. Neither roof nor surface is an input to our number. They are here because you asked what the game looks like, not because we priced them.

The two numbers underneath

TeamEL NFL RatingSide
Chicago Bears 2.23 Away
Green Bay Packers 1.52 Home

The rating is points versus a league average opponent on a neutral field. Our number includes about 2 points of home field. It is a margin model, not a proven spread beater. Full board: the NFL power ratings.

Where the numbers come from. Schedules and finals come from the league data we load each night. Lines are the latest capture at DraftKings, FanDuel or BetMGM, with the book named beside every number. Every Pick locks when it posts and grades at that number on the public record. Our number is context; the panel makes the call. Research, never a guarantee. 21+.