Edge Labs EDGE LABS Market intelligence
CFB NFL NBA CBB
← This week's CFB board
CFB · Week 8 · Sat, Oct 24 · 7:30 PM ET · Bobcat Stadium (TX) · FINAL Utah State 17, Texas State 20

Utah State at Texas State. Pick: Under 61.5. No call on the spread.

The call

No call Spread
the analyst panel worked this game and made no call
Pick Total WIN
Under 61.5
-110 · BetMGM
Ace backs this callStack backs this callBuck backs this call 3 of 3
locked 61.5 · closed 59.5

The panelists

Ace backs this call
The fox
SpreadUtah State
TotalUnder 61.5
Play toUtah State +13.5
Play toUnder 61.5
Keys to the game
  • Utah State’s October 19 game preview lists its defensive conference rankings and notes three road games against ranked opponents.
  • Texas State recorded 503 rushing yards and 716 total yards in its 66-27 win over Colorado State.
  • Covers lists Brosterhous as the starter in Utah State’s last game and Hillstead as questionable with an October 10 designation.
What beats it

On the spread. Texas State’s 503-yard rushing performance is a direct warning against an Aggies run defense allowing 140.8 rushing yards per game, and another efficient Bobcats ground game can make the late move look justified.

On the total. Texas State’s explosive rushing attack can repeatedly shorten the field or generate quick scores, and Utah State’s turnover issues could add possessions and scoring opportunities.

Read Ace's full case

Spread.Market first: Texas State’s 66-27 rout of Colorado State, including 503 rushing yards and 716 total yards, plus Utah State’s 14.5 points per game, explains both the favorite and the move from the opening range to Texas State -13.5. That move has already captured the obvious Texas State offensive breakout. Utah State has faced three ranked road opponents, and its official preview lists a defense ranked second in the Pac-12 in total defense and fourth in scoring defense. The Aggies also started Grady Brosterhous in their latest game, so the stale Hillstead questionable listing should not be treated as a newly lost starting quarterback. I lean to the points at +13.5, but not enough to bet after the five point move and with Texas State’s rushing matchup capable of creating separation.

Total.The market first explanation for 61 to 61.5 is Texas State’s 66-27 result, a 716-yard performance that invites an expectation of another fast Bobcats game. The under case is that Utah State has scored only 14.5 points per game, while its defense is fourth in the Pac-12 in scoring defense and has played a notably difficult schedule. Brosterhous, not the injury-listed Hillstead, started the last game, so quarterback uncertainty is not the core case. Mild outdoor wind and an 80 degree kickoff are only a small under input. The total model’s 57.8 supports the direction but is not decisive because its own market comparison is weaker and it does not capture Texas State’s current offensive pace. Under 61.5 is a lean only.

Where our number looks wrong.The spread model is not materially disagreeing with the market, its Texas State -12.9 number is only 0.6 points from -13.5. Treating that tiny difference as support for Utah State would misuse a model with documented margin error far larger than the gap.

More key facts
  • Utah State’s official preview lists 23.5 points allowed per game and fourth in the Pac-12 in scoring defense.
  • Texas State’s official recap reports 66 points, 503 rushing yards and 716 total yards against Colorado State.
Stack backs this call
The bull
SpreadTexas State
TotalUnder 61.5
Play toTexas State -13.5
Play toUnder 61.5
Keys to the game
  • AP preview: Texas State favored by 8.5; Utah State 14.5 points per game (136th); Texas State 562.3 yards per game (1st), 32.2 points allowed (122nd); Brosterhous 914 pass yards, 7 TD, 6 INT
  • Utah State midseason review: league worst 11 touchdowns, Pac-12's worst rushing attack, 19 sacks allowed, defense the strongest unit, Brosterhous the clear starter
  • Texas State rushed for a school record 503 yards in a 66 to 27 win over Colorado State
What beats it

On the spread. Utah State's defense is its strength (23.5 points allowed per game, 66th) and it lost at Washington by two; Texas State's defense is 122nd, it is minus 5 in turnovers and 128th in red zone scoring rate, so a couple of stalled drives and a garbage time Utah State touchdown land the game inside 14. Utah State also comes off a bye with two weeks to prepare, and buying a favorite after a five point steam move is buying the worst of the number.

On the total. Texas State has scored 49, 63 and 66 at home against FBS and FCS opponents, its defense is 137th against the pass so even Utah State could reach the mid 20s, and turnovers on both sides (both teams at minus 5 or worse) create short fields. One Texas State blowout performance clears the number alone.

Read Stack's full case

Spread.That is a five point move with no injury news I could find to explain it, so it reads as a rating correction after Texas State ran for a school record 503 yards and 716 total yards against Colorado State, while Utah State's offense sits 136th in scoring at 14.5 points per game. The matchup supports the favorite: Texas State is first nationally in total offense and third in rushing, Utah State has the Pac-12's worst run game and has allowed a league high 19 sacks, and a team that scores this little struggles to hang inside two touchdowns on the road. Texas State won its three home conference and FCS games by 14, 53 and 39. I lean Texas State at -13.5, but the steam has taken the value, so it is a lean and not a bet.

Total.The total rose from 58.5 to 59 at open to 61 to 61.5, following the spread. The over case is Texas State itself: 40 points per game at home pace and a defense that allows 32.2. The under case is Utah State: 14.5 points per game, 129th in yards, 129th in time of possession, and a defense that has held five of six opponents to 33 or fewer. Utah State games this year have averaged about 38 total points; Texas State games about 72. A realistic split is Texas State in the high 30s or low 40s and Utah State in the high teens, which lands near 57 to 59, close to our model's 57.8. Wind around 11 mph is a small drag. I lean under 61.5, but Texas State's ability to score 60 on its own keeps this a lean.

Where our number looks wrong.Our -12.9 is close to the market now, but the in-season rating learns only from margins and cannot see that Texas State's offense is elite while its defense is poor, which makes its margins high variance; the flat 2.5 home field and the rating miss the scale of the Utah State offensive collapse (no FBS team scores fewer). The model is not obviously wrong here, it is just late to a move the market already made.

More key facts
  • Team scoring and pace stats for both teams
  • Utah State results 2026: 17 to 29, 14 to 16, 0 to 33, 21 to 10, 18 to 37, 17 to 16
Buck backs this call
The bear
SpreadUtah State +13.5
TotalUnder 61.5
Play toUtah State +13.5
Play toUnder 61
Keys to the game
  • AP preview: Utah State 14.5 points per game, Texas State 562.3 total yards per game, defense 424.3 yards allowed, opening line Texas State minus 8.5.
  • Brosterhous is the Utah State starter, offense league-worst, defense a strength, 50 penalties through six games.
What beats it

On the spread. Texas State averages 40 points per game and leads FBS in total offense. If Utah State's quarterback turns it over twice or the Aggies' line allows sacks as it has all season, Texas State wins by three scores. Utah State's lopsided losses came against Utah and Boise State.

On the total. Texas State has scored 49, 63, 29 and 66 in four of its last five games and its defense gives up points, so Utah State only needs about 20 for the over to be live. A blowout lets the Bobcats pile up points late.

Read Buck's full case

Spread.The market has already moved this game from Texas State minus 8.5 or 9.5 at open to minus 13.5 everywhere, which prices in the Bobcats' 66-27 win over Colorado State and Utah State's offense, which scores 14.5 points per game, last in the country by the AP's count. That is the strongest explanation for the number. What it may overweight is a one-game surge: Texas State's defense allows 424 yards per game, 125th in FBS, and the Bobcats are minus 5 in turnover margin, so a Utah State team built around a strong defense and Brosterhous running the ball can keep this inside two touchdowns without needing to score much. Utah State has lost four games but only one by more than 21 points. The counter is real: the Aggies have 19 sacks allowed and the worst run game in the league. I lean Utah State at plus 13.5 as a small price play, not a bet, because the move already captured the obvious information.

Total.The number of 61.5 is high because Texas State scores around 40 and its defense is porous, and both of the Bobcats' recent games went over by a wide margin. The under case rests on Utah State: 14.5 points per game, the league's worst run game, a conservative coach who punts on short fourth downs, and 11 touchdowns all season. For the over to land, Texas State needs about 45 and Utah State 17 to 20, which is possible but requires the Aggies to be forced into pass-heavy play they have not handled well. Weather is warm with a light breeze, neutral.

More key facts
  • Utah State scoring 14.5 per game and Texas State defense 125th in yards allowed.
  • Utah State offense league-worst in touchdowns with conservative fourth-down choices.

The call, written up

On the total

Under 61.5. BetMGM moved 59.5 to 61.5, and the market now ranges from 61 to 61.5. The captured October 22 forecast is partly cloudy, 81 F, 11.5 mph wind and 3 percent precipitation, a small under input. Brosterhous started Utah State's latest game, while Utah State allowed 23.5 points per game through six games and ranked fourth in Pac-12 scoring defense on October 19. The counter is Texas State's October 15, 66-27, 716-yard performance, which can carry the scoring. Under 61.5, -110 at BetMGM.

How to read this page

The calls come first on this page: the spread and the total, each a Pick or a Lean, then Ace, Stack and Buck one by one. The market's number, our number and the gap between them sit further down as MODEL CONTEXT: that is the input our analyst panel argued from, not a call of its own. A Pick is our strongest call and goes on the record. A Lean is which way we lean on a game and is not a pick.The meter shows how strongly the panel backs the call. It is not a probability or a hit rate.

The signals and the market

3 independent signals on this game. The tally per side, every angle with its sample size, and the line movement from open to now open with membership. They are research context, never a pick. Membership

Model context

The numbers the panel argued from. Our models price a game, the panel makes the call, and the calls above are the call. Nothing in this block is a call.

Market line
Texas State -14.5
DraftKings
Our model number
Texas State by 10.3
the calibrated EL CFB rating number
Spread gap
4.2 points
the distance between our model number and the market. Context for the panel, not a call of its own.
Market total
60.5
market total at the model run, Oct 24, 12:38 PM ET
Our total
57.6
EL CFB Totals
Total gap
-2.9
the distance between our model total and the market total. Context for the panel, not a call of its own.

The totals number is a registered candidate that loses to the closing total: across 2,264 held out games it missed the combined score by 12.862 points on average and the closing total missed by 12.635, ahead of us in all 3 of those seasons, so it never posts to the board and never enters the record on its own.

Trends and splits

Descriptive context, every line with the games it counts. Filters like these did not hold up as predictors in our testing, so none of this feeds a call and none of it is a reason a pick wins. Situational splits look back 3 seasons and need at least 8 decided games to be shown at all. Records against the number and on the total join these once our closing-line history is restored; the straight-up splits are live now.

Utah State
  • won 2 of their last 5 (n=5, 2026)
  • 2-13 straight up on the road (n=15, 2024 to 2026)
Texas State
  • won 3 of their last 5 (n=5, 2026)
  • 11-6 straight up at home (n=17, 2024 to 2026)
Over and under splits
  • Utah State have gone UNDER in 8 of their last 10
    total · under · lean · n=10
    Utah State's last 10 gradable games landed under 80% vs the consensus total. Streak continuation tested 2013-2025: 49.5% train / 46.4% held-out 2025, it does NOT persist. A real recent pattern, weigh with the matchup, not alone.
The rest of the splits we can compute on this game
Utah State
  • won 3 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • 3-11 straight up in day games (n=14, 2024 to 2026)
  • 7-2 straight up in home night games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-6 straight up in day games after a straight up loss (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-6 straight up in road divisional games (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • 2-6 straight up in road night games (n=8, 2024 to 2026)
  • 10-5 straight up at home (n=15, 2024 to 2026)
  • 8-4 straight up at home after a straight up loss (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • 8-4 straight up in night games after a straight up loss (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • 6-3 straight up in home divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 7-4 straight up in divisional games after a straight up loss (n=11, 2024 to 2026)
  • 6-5 straight up in night divisional games (n=11, 2024 to 2026)
  • 8-9 straight up in divisional games (n=17, 2024 to 2026)
  • 9-8 straight up in night games (n=17, 2024 to 2026)
  • 10-10 straight up after a straight up loss (n=20, 2024 to 2026)
Texas State
  • won 7 of their last 10 (n=10, 2025 to 2026)
  • 10-7 straight up in day games (n=17, 2024 to 2026)
  • 7-5 straight up in home night games (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • 5-7 straight up on the road (n=12, 2024 to 2026)
  • 5-4 straight up in day divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2025)
  • 5-4 straight up in home divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 4-5 straight up in night divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 4-5 straight up in road day games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 4-5 straight up in road divisional games (n=9, 2024 to 2026)
  • 8-7 straight up in night games (n=15, 2024 to 2026)
  • 9-9 straight up in divisional games (n=18, 2024 to 2026)
  • 7-7 straight up after a straight up loss (n=14, 2024 to 2026)
  • 5-5 straight up in divisional games after a straight up loss (n=10, 2024 to 2026)
  • 4-4 straight up in day games after a straight up loss (n=8, 2024 to 2026)

Conditions at kickoff

Partially cloudy. 82F · wind 12 mph

The ratings underneath, and where the numbers come from

The two numbers underneath

TeamEL ratingConference
Utah State -4.847 Pac-12
Texas State 1.67 Pac-12

Our number includes about 2.5 points of home field. Full board: the power ratings.

Where the numbers come from. Schedules and finals come from the league data we load each night. Lines are the latest capture at DraftKings, FanDuel or BetMGM, with the book named beside every number. Every Pick locks when it posts and grades at that number on the public record. Our number is context; the panel makes the call. Research, never a guarantee. 21+.