Edge Labs EDGE LABS Market intelligence
CFB NFL
Edge Labs · CFB · Talent vs Record

The talent a roster signed vs what it did.

Every FBS team's recruiting talent (the 4-year composite, and its national rank that season) lined up against its actual record. The gap is the story · who outran the roster they had, and who left blue-chip talent on the field. National rank, record, and the sample behind each, on every team.

Read this first

Talent is a leading indicator and records drift back toward the roster. In our point-in-time test (2020·2025, n>150 each side), teams that outran their recruiting talent fell about 15 win-percentage points the next season, and the ones that underachieved rose about as much. So these gaps tend to close next year. That is a direction the data leans, not a guaranteed pick and not a bet.

+74gap · pts Biggest overachiever · 2026
Fresno State
Pac-12 · talent #135 of 137 · 3-1 (4 g)
thin talent (#135 of 137), went 3-1. Outran the roster.
-49gap · pts Biggest underachiever · 2026
Charlotte
AAC · talent #71 of 137 · 0-4 (4 g)
thin talent (#71 of 137), went 0-4. Left it on the field.

Filters

season · league
Overachiever · won more than the talent rank implied. Underrated roster.
Underachiever · blue-chip talent, thin record. Wasted talent.
Gap = win% minus where the talent rank sits in the field, in percentage points.
All FBS · 2026 Talent vs record · biggest gaps first
n=129 teams · 129 ranked
Team Talent rank Composite Record Win% Gap (pts) ▼
Fresno StatePac-12 #135 / 137 58.1 3-1 (4g) 75% +74
New MexicoMountain West #134 / 137 58.4 3-1 (4g) 75% +73
James MadisonSun Belt #99 / 137 65.8 4-0 (4g) 100% +72
Air ForceMountain West #123 / 137 63.1 2-1 (3g) 67% +56
ArmyAAC #121 / 137 63.6 2-1 (3g) 67% +55
MarshallSun Belt #105 / 137 65.3 3-1 (4g) 75% +51
DelawareC-USA #137 / 137 57.0 2-2 (4g) 50% +50
TulsaAAC #103 / 137 65.6 3-1 (4g) 75% +50
CharlotteAAC #71 / 137 69.4 0-4 (4g) 0% -49
Texas A&MSEC #4 / 137 83.6 2-2 (4g) 50% -48
CincinnatiBig 12 #66 / 137 70.0 4-0 (4g) 100% +48
BYUBig 12 #65 / 137 70.2 3-0 (3g) 100% +47
Georgia TechACC #39 / 137 72.8 1-3 (4g) 25% -47
DukeACC #64 / 137 70.2 4-0 (4g) 100% +46
South FloridaAAC #63 / 137 70.6 4-0 (4g) 100% +46
Boise StatePac-12 #96 / 137 66.1 3-1 (4g) 75% +45
Kent StateMAC #129 / 137 62.4 2-2 (4g) 50% +44
Central MichiganMAC #128 / 137 62.5 2-2 (4g) 50% +43
RutgersBig Ten #44 / 137 72.3 1-3 (4g) 25% -43
South CarolinaSEC #10 / 137 80.4 2-2 (4g) 50% -43
Georgia StateSun Belt #92 / 137 66.6 3-1 (4g) 75% +42
OklahomaSEC #12 / 137 79.8 2-2 (4g) 50% -42
Florida StateACC #14 / 137 79.4 2-2 (4g) 50% -40
UtahBig 12 #54 / 137 71.5 4-0 (4g) 100% +39
UTSAAAC #86 / 137 67.9 3-1 (4g) 75% +38
LibertyC-USA #85 / 137 68.0 3-1 (4g) 75% +37
Western MichiganMAC #118 / 137 63.9 2-2 (4g) 50% +36
TCUBig 12 #21 / 137 75.5 2-2 (4g) 50% -35
MarylandBig Ten #22 / 137 75.1 2-2 (4g) 50% -35
UCLABig Ten #48 / 137 72.0 4-0 (4g) 100% +35
KansasBig 12 #46 / 137 72.3 1-2 (3g) 33% -34
VirginiaACC #79 / 137 68.4 3-1 (4g) 75% +32
IowaBig Ten #45 / 137 72.3 4-0 (4g) 100% +32
UNLVMountain West #112 / 137 64.8 2-2 (4g) 50% +32
PittsburghACC #42 / 137 72.4 4-0 (4g) 100% +30
Florida AtlanticAAC #76 / 137 68.6 3-1 (4g) 75% +30
Texas StateSun Belt #109 / 137 64.9 2-2 (4g) 50% +29
Texas TechBig 12 #41 / 137 72.7 4-0 (4g) 100% +29
Florida InternationalC-USA #108 / 137 64.9 2-2 (4g) 50% +29
ColoradoBig 12 #31 / 137 73.8 2-2 (4g) 50% -28
SyracuseACC #55 / 137 71.5 1-2 (3g) 33% -27
MemphisAAC #70 / 137 69.5 3-1 (4g) 75% +26
IndianaBig Ten #36 / 137 73.3 4-0 (4g) 100% +26
WyomingMountain West #104 / 137 65.5 2-2 (4g) 50% +26
Ohio StateBig Ten #1 / 137 85.4 3-1 (4g) 75% -25
StanfordACC #35 / 137 73.4 2-2 (4g) 50% -25
ToledoMAC #69 / 137 69.5 3-1 (4g) 75% +25
Kennesaw StateC-USA #136 / 137 57.1 1-3 (4g) 25% +24
BuffaloMAC #102 / 137 65.7 2-2 (4g) 50% +24
West VirginiaBig 12 #68 / 137 69.6 3-1 (4g) 75% +24
NebraskaBig Ten #32 / 137 73.8 4-0 (4g) 100% +23
Arkansas StateSun Belt #100 / 137 65.8 2-2 (4g) 50% +23
PurdueBig Ten #73 / 137 69.3 1-3 (4g) 25% -22
Old DominionSun Belt #133 / 137 60.4 1-3 (4g) 25% +22
Jacksonville StateC-USA #84 / 137 68.0 3-2 (5g) 60% +21
Mississippi StateSEC #29 / 137 74.0 4-0 (4g) 100% +21
Southern MissSun Belt #75 / 137 68.8 1-3 (4g) 25% -21
New Mexico StateC-USA #131 / 137 60.5 1-3 (4g) 25% +21
Eastern MichiganMAC #110 / 137 64.9 2-3 (5g) 40% +20
LSUSEC #9 / 137 80.6 3-1 (4g) 75% -19
Boston CollegeACC #43 / 137 72.3 2-2 (4g) 50% -19
Wake ForestACC #61 / 137 70.6 3-1 (4g) 75% +19
North TexasAAC #93 / 137 66.2 2-2 (4g) 50% +18
OregonBig Ten #11 / 137 80.4 3-1 (4g) 75% -18
UTEPMountain West #126 / 137 62.6 1-3 (4g) 25% +17
Virginia TechACC #24 / 137 74.9 4-0 (4g) 100% +17
LouisvilleACC #47 / 137 72.2 2-2 (4g) 50% -16
Penn StateBig Ten #13 / 137 79.6 3-1 (4g) 75% -16
Louisiana TechC-USA #113 / 137 64.8 1-2 (3g) 33% +16
Missouri StateC-USA #124 / 137 63.0 1-3 (4g) 25% +15
IllinoisBig Ten #90 / 137 67.0 2-2 (4g) 50% +15
ClemsonACC #15 / 137 79.1 3-1 (4g) 75% -15
Middle TennesseeC-USA #88 / 137 67.5 2-2 (4g) 50% +14
MichiganBig Ten #16 / 137 78.7 3-1 (4g) 75% -14
North CarolinaACC #28 / 137 74.2 2-1 (3g) 67% -13
MinnesotaBig Ten #53 / 137 71.5 3-1 (4g) 75% +13
AuburnSEC #17 / 137 78.6 3-1 (4g) 75% -13
Michigan StateBig Ten #51 / 137 71.8 2-2 (4g) 50% -13
South AlabamaSun Belt #87 / 137 67.8 2-2 (4g) 50% +13
Iowa StateBig 12 #52 / 137 71.5 2-2 (4g) 50% -12
Ole MissSEC #18 / 137 78.2 3-1 (4g) 75% -12
NevadaMountain West #119 / 137 63.7 1-3 (4g) 25% +12
NavyAAC #107 / 137 65.0 1-2 (3g) 33% +11
Bowling GreenMAC #122 / 137 63.1 0-4 (4g) 0% -11
MissouriSEC #20 / 137 75.9 3-1 (4g) 75% -11
Oklahoma StateBig 12 #50 / 137 71.8 3-1 (4g) 75% +11
Coastal CarolinaSun Belt #117 / 137 64.3 1-3 (4g) 25% +10
ArizonaBig 12 #49 / 137 71.9 3-1 (4g) 75% +10
OhioMAC #83 / 137 68.1 2-2 (4g) 50% +10
Western KentuckyC-USA #89 / 137 67.0 1-3 (4g) 25% -10
ArkansasSEC #56 / 137 71.3 2-2 (4g) 50% -10
Sam HoustonC-USA #116 / 137 64.3 1-3 (4g) 25% +10
UConnIndependent #82 / 137 68.2 2-2 (4g) 50% +10
WisconsinBig Ten #23 / 137 75.0 3-1 (4g) 75% -9
TempleAAC #115 / 137 64.6 1-3 (4g) 25% +9
RiceAAC #91 / 137 66.9 1-3 (4g) 25% -9
Northern IllinoisMountain West #125 / 137 62.7 0-4 (4g) 0% -9
TroySun Belt #81 / 137 68.2 2-2 (4g) 50% +9
NorthwesternBig Ten #58 / 137 70.9 2-1 (3g) 67% +9
San Diego StatePac-12 #114 / 137 64.7 1-3 (4g) 25% +8
Colorado StatePac-12 #80 / 137 68.4 2-2 (4g) 50% +8
Arizona StateBig 12 #57 / 137 71.0 2-1 (3g) 67% +8
BaylorBig 12 #25 / 137 74.4 3-1 (4g) 75% -7
TulaneAAC #59 / 137 70.8 2-2 (4g) 50% -7
USCBig Ten #19 / 137 76.5 4-1 (5g) 80% -7
Washington StatePac-12 #94 / 137 66.2 1-3 (4g) 25% -7
Oregon StatePac-12 #78 / 137 68.4 2-2 (4g) 50% +7
NC StateACC #60 / 137 70.8 2-2 (4g) 50% -7
VanderbiltSEC #26 / 137 74.2 3-1 (4g) 75% -7
Utah StatePac-12 #111 / 137 64.8 1-3 (4g) 25% +6
TennesseeSEC #27 / 137 74.2 3-1 (4g) 75% -6
UABAAC #77 / 137 68.5 2-2 (4g) 50% +6
FloridaSEC #8 / 137 80.6 4-0 (4g) 100% +5
Notre DameIndependent #7 / 137 81.1 4-0 (4g) 100% +4
Kansas StateBig 12 #40 / 137 72.7 3-1 (4g) 75% +4
AkronMAC #98 / 137 65.9 1-3 (4g) 25% -4
UCFBig 12 #30 / 137 73.9 3-1 (4g) 75% -4
MiamiACC #6 / 137 82.2 4-0 (4g) 100% +4
Miami (OH)MAC #74 / 137 69.1 2-2 (4g) 50% +4
GeorgiaSEC #5 / 137 82.8 4-0 (4g) 100% +3
Ball StateMAC #106 / 137 65.0 1-3 (4g) 25% +2
HoustonBig 12 #38 / 137 73.0 3-1 (4g) 75% +2
KentuckySEC #33 / 137 73.7 3-1 (4g) 75% -1
East CarolinaAAC #67 / 137 69.9 2-2 (4g) 50% -1
Georgia SouthernSun Belt #101 / 137 65.8 1-3 (4g) 25% -1
SMUACC #37 / 137 73.2 3-1 (4g) 75% +1
TexasSEC #3 / 137 84.1 4-0 (4g) 100% +1
AlabamaSEC #2 / 137 84.1 4-0 (4g) 100% +1
WashingtonBig Ten #34 / 137 73.7 3-1 (4g) 75% -1
National talent rank is across all 129 FBS programs with a composite this season · record is regular season from game results · gap = win% minus the talent-rank percentile, in points · a frequency and a direction, never a pick or a bet.

This is talent intelligence, not a betting edge. The recruiting composite does not beat the spread · we tested it and it lands near a coin flip against the number in every bucket. What it does do is show where a roster's talent and its record pulled apart, and that gap tends to regress. Every number ships with its sample (games behind the record, programs behind the rank). Research, not advice.